THE WEDGEFIELD EXAMINER ANNOUNCES 5,000 HITS TO THE BLOG

 

BRADY, THE WEDGEFIELD EXAMINER'S TOP DOG SAYS, "STAYED TUNED"

Wondering what the celebration is all about?  The Wedgefield Examiner is operated by me, a person who is next to computer illiterate.  Additionally, I run through all parts of my life and have little time to care, or worry if I misspell, leave out punctuation, etc.  We don't have a proof reader.  I'm not all hung up on that.  Judge as you may.  Our intentions are good.  We want to keep residents in our community up to date on what is happening.  We secure documentation for our articles.  If they are opinion or rumor we state that.  We didn't know if we could develop a mechanism to get the word out.  Then we didn't know if we could manage it and keep it afloat.  We have.  We thank you for your readership and occasional comments.  For today, we are pleased with ourselves.  Brady and I shook hands this morning and congratulated each other. 

We've got a lot to cover yet.  Please read the next three to four articles.  They've all been posted this week.

DON'T MISS OUT!

I've put 3 articles up over the last few days.  One is authored by me, Madeline Y. Claveloux - "THE WEDGEFIELD PEACE KEEPERS SOLICITATIONS FOR MONEY, PROMISES (AGAIN), AND INVASION OF PRIVACY"

"RESIDENT JUDE DAVIS RESPONDS TO "THE WEDGEFIELD PEACE KEEPERS SOLICITATIONS FOR MONEY, PROMISES (AGAIN), AND INVASION OF PRIVACY"

The newest is:  A COMPREHENSIVE LOOK AT THE ARBORS - BY R.V. WHEELER.

Please take time to read each of them.  Ask yourself where your cohesive Board is?  Why aren't they telling us about threats of lawsuits?  Why do they keep tabling the Arbors?  In their cohesive, "maybe I better not think and act for myself mode", what work is getting done?  I voted for those I voted for because I liked their apparent approach and style of dealing with business.  I thought they would bring those qualities to the Board table and work toward open governance.  I thought they would realize that residents have functioning brains and wanted to know the issues.  I don't like feeling as though they think I need to be protected from what is going on (I'm being kind.).  I don't like observing the fact that they seem to ignore the research and assistance of quality residents like Wheeler and Davis.  We aren't part of a herd, all branded by our keepers.  Our issues are numerous and I want the open truth and credible resolution.  I don't want tea party Board Meetings. You know simpering people drinking tea and telling each other how wonderful they are. I want down to business, down to the issues kind of governance.

Please read the articles suggested above.  PREPARE YOURSELF FOR ANOTHER ANNOUNCEMENT FROM BRADY THE WEDGEFIELD EXAMINER DOG.  We are close to another milestone.

A COMPREHENSIVE LOOK AT THE ARBORS - BY R.V. WHEELER

Resident R.V. Wheeler has spent considerable time pulling together concrete information on the Arbors.  He has served on the WPA Legal Committee, Policy Manual Committee, and on the Election Committee.  He has a reputation for staying with a project and leaving no stone unturned.  He appears to have "no side, no private oar in the water".    He secures information, presents it, and lets the chips fall where they may. 

In my humble opinion, your Board is letting them (the chips) float because in their cohesiveness they are failing to attend to business.

HERE IS HIS REPORT TO THE BOARD:

PLEASE ENLARGE ON YOUR SCREEN

RESIDENT JUDE DAVIS RESPONDS TO: "THE WEDGEFIELD PEACEKEEPERS - SOLICITATIONS FOR MONEY, PROMISES (AGAIN), AND INVASION OF PRIVACY

Madeline,

Your latest article hit the nail on the head. We, this community, will never have peace and harmony until these concerned crazies stop threatening lawsuits. They have yet to deal with the suit against them by members of the reviled 2009 board. The defendants in this suit are using every delaying tactic known to man in the hopes that the plaintiffs will drop it. I have three words for them—NOT A CHANCE!

What continues to amaze me is that these individuals threatening lawsuits are surprised when someone fights back. Vince has already admitted in writing that they expect that Bell will pay them off to avoid embarrassment. I believe that it would be in Tom Winslow’s best interest to fight any charge of malpractice and do not believe that Ed Bell is easily intimidated. Have these people met either man?

I understand that this latest solicitation for money is being led by two women. One is the infamous CZ. This is the CZ who led the charge against the 2009 board only to settle after two years of putting this community through hell without resolving the underlying issue of who is responsible for canal maintenance. This is the same CZ who ran unsuccessfully for the board in 2011. This is the same CZ who, in her deposition, said that she filed the original lawsuit on behalf of the “203 people who signed the petition” making them ALL potential defendants in the still existing countersuit. This is the same CZ who abruptly quit in 2009 and yet continues to want to micromanage the Board of Directors. Unfortunately, the existing board has at least two and possibly more, of her puppets trying to pursue the cc agenda at the expense of all of us. These gentlemen have not had an original thought in at least two years. The puppet mistress pulls the strings.

The other woman trying to solicit money is a canal lot owner. This woman, lets call her JS for short, has only paid $450.00 in annual assessments since 2010. She doesn’t like how the other $175 is being spent. I am unsure as to how she knows just how anything is spent when the rest of us do not. JS is the same canal owner who, without regard for her neighbors was the only one who called the police to complain about night time dredging. She called twice and effectively stopped the dredging after p.m.—knowing full well that this would impact the amount of fill being removed. The window to dredge extends only to the end of March. What a fine neighbor! This is the same JS who, in a letter to the board, never wants the canals dredged again. Her selfishness knows no bounds and her lack of consideration for her neighbors is evident.

Part of the brazenness exhibited by these concerned crazies may be the fault of the Board. After successfully removing me and Karl from the Board by violating our by-laws and using State law, the newly reconstituted Board failed to follow the covenants and collect on assessments due. Bob Moran, THEIR chosen lawyer, said to go ahead and collect. When others in the community tried to use the same State law that they used in the recall, and Moran said that State law took precedence over the By-laws, these crazies fired Moran and found a new attorney to say that the By-laws were in first place. This new attorney has given two differing opinions on collecting the individual assessment. Was the second opinion after CZ visited him and explained the '”legal situation according to C?” The present Board received a threatening e-mail from Dr. RP, and did nothing. In fact, one Board member may have resigned over this threat.

This Board is not collecting the individual assessments in any conventional way. We are owed over $100,000 in arrears,if it is uncollectable it needs to be classified as bad debt and written off. Supposedly, less than $20,000 of the arrears is from the canal lot assessment. This Board has filed in small claims court against a resident who has failed to follow ARC guidelines. Pay attention all residents who have utility or recreational trailors in your yards, who have clearly visible propane tanks, and the individuals who have put barriers up on WPA property, you may be next.

I have heard it said that this Board is a cohesive group that works well together. They certainly are good at sweeping things under the rug and shutting down anyone who challenges the status quo. We do ,however, have a new policy manual and a management firm as well as the poop signs. All that I’m asking for is nine people who think for themselves, voice an opinion, and research the facts for themselves. At some of the Board meetings, a question arises that I know the answer to but will not comment for fear, ha, of the twitter sisters. Much of the information the Board is looking for is either at the home of CZ or in the attic. So far, no one has bothered to investigate.

What a disappointment!

Jude

THE WEDGEFIELD PEACE KEEPERS - SOLICITATIONS FOR MONEY, PROMISES (AGAIN), AND INVASION OF PRIVACY

THE PEACE KEEPERS - REALLY?????

Resident Morabit, spoke at both the February and March Board Meetings.  His topic was peace and harmony.  Each time he spoke there were requests for the Board to initiate a lawsuit against the dredging loan bank, the Bell Legal Firm, and Attorney Tom Winslow.  By the March Meeting there was an email sent to the Board with a threat that if they didn't vote to sue they would be sued.  Board Member Barrier brought the motion to the Board table.

Let's start at the beginning with the claim of a call for peace and harmony.  Does any of this fall within your definition of peace and harmony?  Sounds like a ploy to me to get your attention.  After all, who wouldn't want peace and harmony in their community?  Really, it is just same old, same old, and your community was trashed by these Concerned Citizens two years ago.

Yes, two years ago they were so concerned for you and me and that awful 2009 Dredging Board that they sued in behalf of you, because you can't think for yourself and they knew better.  In some cases, some of you didn't think for yourself and signed petitions, donated funds for a lawsuit, signed petitions, carried signs, and harmed your neighbors and your community.

They made promises.  Your funds, your commitment, would result in a declaratory judgement.  In fact the court date was suppose to be November 30, 2009.  They told you they would fight to their last breath for you.  Wasn't there a quote by Ms. Zieske in one of the newspapers that said that?  That's right, they took it to the papers to make their ugly accusations.  They didn't care what it did to your community or your individual property values.  They were going to see that two of those 2009 Board Members went to jail for bank fraud.  They attempted to stop the bank loan.  All this because they were protecting you.

They dragged it out for over two years and NOT ONE OF THEIR PROMISES WERE KEPT!  They settled the court case and did nothing for you or me, but destroy our community, and pit neighbor against neighbor with lies and half truths.

THE NEW PROMISE:

They have a law firm in Charleston waiting to take the new case.  THE PROMISE:  They are going to sue and get your $5,000 (one time canal lot owner individual assessment) and the $175.00/yr assessments back!  They are looking out for you again.  How reliable are they?  Well history is the best predictor of the future.  How did that go last time?  Additionally, the threat to sue was sent to the Board by a Concerned Citizen stating he had been asked to send it, but he wouldn't sign it because he didn't write it, but agreed with it.  The author remains a mystery.  When I say it, write it, and believe it myself, I always put my name on it.  What about you?  Really, if it is good for all of Wedgefield, wouldn't you want people to know that you thought of it?

THE SOLICITATION AND INVASION OF PRIVACY:  


They are phoning and visiting individual homes and asking for a donation toward hiring the Charleston Law Firm to go forward with the lawsuit.  They are contacting old people, middle aged people, and young people.  Isn't there a sign posted near the front gate that states, "no solicitation"?  They are above it all.  Once again they know what is best for you but they are such cowards they remain nameless in their writings.

Two years ago, they badgered people repeatedly, to the point that some said they gave them $50 and signed petitions, etc. so they wouldn't darken their doors again.  Some who signed and contributed two years ago, have every right to fear that they may be held responsible in the current counter suit. 

I'm told their number of committed, contributing warriors has dropped considerably with the new lawsuit campaign.  People are wore out.  They are sick of their lying, false promises, the sullying of neighbors reputations, and most of all the angst they have caused in Wedgefield.

Will you contribute?  Want your name to appear on their donor list?  Want to harm your neighbors and your neighborhood, with their false promises?  We'll see.  Recently, they claimed they only needed another $1,000 to move forward with the lawsuit.  How many more years of hell and disruption will we have if they do?  What will it accomplish?  Their last lawsuit didn't do a dam thing for you and me and our community, except harm it.

DO YOU HAVE A COMMENT?  SEND IT TO:  wedgefieldexaminer@yahoo.com BE SURE AND STATE WHETHER YOU WANT YOUR NAME PRINTED.

WPA MONTHLY BOARD MEETING, A SURPRISE AGENDA

The WPA monthly Board Meeting is scheduled for April 17th at 7:00 PM.  No agenda is posted at the WPA website.  It is suppose to be posted one week prior to the meeting.  As of today, there is no agenda.  It will be a surprise.  Please plan on attending.  There is a lot going on in the community above and below the surface.   As in the past, that doesn't mean your Board will update us on any of it.  Business as usual?  Probably not. there hasn't been a lot of usual business conducted since the 2011 Annual Meeting.   Read the following 3 documented articles to keep yourself informed.

WHY THE LIES? - Jude Davis

FROM:

• Jude Davis

TO:

• wedgefieldexaminer@yahoo.com

Message flagged

Wednesday, April 11, 2012 10:32 AM

Dear Madeline,

I, too, am wondering about the apparent cover-up with the Legal Committee. It seems that the Board members involved at the time and Moody can’t get their stories straight. I believe that Johnny Huggins’ and Carol Zieske’s trip to see Mr. Moody put him in an unethical situation. Johnny was being sued by Carol—no matter what he was told. He, Johnny, was represented by an attorney—Mike Smith. Where was the contact with Mike Smith at this time. Carol was also a plaintiff in a lawsuit against another member of the Board—Larry McMillin. Larry has two lawyers—Smith and Gene Fulton. Any sign of these lawyers at this meeting?

Moody and Fred said that he, Fred. dropped the notebooks off. Carol account of the notebooks is different. Carol went to Moody to explain the “legal situation according to Carol, Fred, and George.” I would have loved to be a fly on that wall!!! Who gave Mr. Moody an account of the legal situation from the side of the people Carol was suing? Did anyone ask you!

These meetings were improper and maybe unethical. I am waiting for the Board to at least ‘out’ these actions. Instead, they cover-up with out and out lies. If Mr. Moody had made himself aware of the legal actions presently facing the WPA, as any attorney of record should, he knew this was not right.

It is beyond belief to me that the association dues for me, Karl, Ruth, Larry, Brenda, and you were SPENT by the Board for the person suing us to spend time with the WPA lawyer. When will someone admit that this was wrong? When will the lies stop and something be done? Don’t hold your breath!

Jude

DO YOU HAVE A COMMENT?  SEND IT TO:  wedgefieldexaminer@yahoo.com  Be sure and note whether you would like your name published.

THE WEDGEFIELD EXAMINER'S TOP DOG WANTS TO KNOW, "WHAT THE HECK IS GOING ON WITH THE WPA LEGAL BILLS? WHO IS TRYING TO COVER UP THE FACTS? DID A RESIDENT KNOW THAT THEY TOLD ON THEMSELVES AND THE BOARD? FINALLY, HE WANTS TO KNOW WHY THE BOARD ISN'T GETTING TO THE BOTTOM OF THIS TAIL (he means tail)?

BRADY SAYS IT LOOKS LIKE A COVER UP TO HIM

Residents, sometimes the situations and facts in Wedgefield get very confusing.  When they do I put Brady on the case.  We've reviewed some documents that we have already posted on the blog.  We are more confused than ever.  In our humble opinions, someone is either lying or covering up.  You'll decide for yourself.  Take a few minutes and review what we have presented below and see if you draw the same conclusion.

The contradicting information resides in Attorney Moody's legal bills (current WPA attorney) and the information regarding some of  the items on them.  It seems that the Association was billed for a meeting between Attorney Perrow (Represented Zieske, Wilson, and Thomas as plaintiffs in the canal lawsuit that was initally filed against the 2009 WPA Board and individual Board Members.  By the summer of 2011 the suit against the Board had been dropped.)  The meeting in question took place after the Board was dropped, but before the rest of the suit was settled.

Additionally, there is a charge and payment for Attorney Moody meeting with Carol Zieske, one of the plaintiffs, prior to final settlement.

Why would our Board use our assessment dollars to pay our attorney to meet with the lawyer representing individuals who were suing us?  Why would they use our assessment dollars to pay our attorney to meet with one of the plaintiffs?  Why do we have credible conflicting information with no action from our Board?

START AT THE BEGINNING:

Board Member McBride attended a meeting with Attorney Moody and other Board Members.  He took notes and asked that they be attached to the December WPA Minutes, under the Legal Report.  Your Board voted and denied his request.  Please go to OLDER POSTS on this blog and read "McBride's December Legal Report".    At one point in the report he states that he feels there is about $5,000 of legal expense for items that are questionable.  Remember that figure and we'll discuss it at the end of this article.

At one point in the report McBride states, "The meetings with Mr. Moody on October 11 and October 12 with Huggins, Wilson, Thomas and Perrow were the topics of the next discussion".  Perrow was the attorney for plaintiffs Wilson and Thomas.  The suit wasn't settled until after those dates.  The Board wasn't being sued.  Residents it was all about legal and getting your assessment dollars to help the cause.  Huggins was Legal Chair.

Later in the report, McBride goes on to say, "We were told by Mr. Moody that he had no knowledge of the lawsuit brought against the WPA by Zieske, Thomas and Wilson."  Even later in the report, McBride states, "Later in the meeting Mr. McBride asked some similar questions and said that he had heard that at the very time Mr.Perrow was the person delaying the final draft of the order that Judge Hyman, Jr. requested per the agreed settlement, which would order dismissal with prejudice of plaintiffs claims.  Mr. Moody replied to this statement that according to Perrow, that he was not the hold up"  If this raised the attention of Brady and I, why didn't it raise the hairs on the back of the Board's individual necks and cause them to ask questions and withhold payment?  After reading this Brady and I about needed a braff bag.

Then it appears that our Board Attorney met with Carol Zieske, the third plaintiff, prior to the settlement.  Earlier in the report, McBride states, "Later in the discussion John McBride asked if he had a meeting with Carol Zieske and Mr. Moody replied that he had the meeting with Carol Zieske to discuss the By Law she wanted  on the ballot and that that was all that he and Carol discussed."  Well, that's not what Ms. Zieske says.  Presented below, is an email from Ms. Zieske to the WPA Board in which she discloses what was discussed at her meeting with Moody.

The Board obviously knows from Zieske's email that Moody met with her on matters other than her Bylaw amendment.  Yet that is not what an inquiring resident was told.  Please go to OLDER BLOGS at this site and read, RESIDENT JUDE DAVIS RESPONDS TO WHY WASN'T THIS THREAT BROUGHT TO THE BOARD TABLE".  I've provided the following pertinent quote from her writings. "I have complained about the communication between Moody and Perrow as unethical. Today, I found in the correspondence file a letter from Carol Zieske saying that she was at a meeting with Moody in order to “explain the legal situation out here.” I doubt that her opinion of the legal situation is the same as mine. When I asked about the rumor that I heard about this meeting, I was told that Moody met with Carol solely about her proposed By-law change. Someone’s nose is growing!"

Did you read what Ms. Zieske states the reason for her meeting was?  Someone is not telling the truth and it isn't Board Member McBride. Ms Zieske is quite blatant about her visit.  Why is our Board afraid to bring these issues to the Board table?

At the beginning of this article I asked that you remember the figure $5,000.  That is the amount that Board Member McBride suggests that we have been billed improperly.  Garrison, Legal Chair and Barrier were on the Board in 2010 when the majority Concerned Citizen Board savagely attacked then Board Members, Reames and Wijthoff.  They threatened them with jail terms over a $7,500 legal bill.  They publicly harassed them through at least 3 meetings.  In the end, their accusations were not justified and the Board sent letters of apology to Wijthoff and Reames.

  Why is Garrison Legal Chair? 

Why isn't the rest of our Board allowing McBride to bring this to the table, investigate, and take appropriate action?  Will you write to see the Moody invoices?  Will you write and ask the Board for a full explanation?   This is important because a portion of the Concerned Citizen group from our community has threatened the Board with another law suit.  I've been writing and providing documentation for almost two years now.  I've contended that "it is all about legal" in several articles.  Add this one to the pile.

DO YOU HAVE A COMMENT?  SEND IT TO:  wedgefieldexaminer@yahoo.com.  BE SURE AND NOTE WHETHER YOU WANT YOUR NAME PUBLISHED WITH YOUR COMMENT.

THANK YOU WPA BOARD

On Wednesday at 7:30 PM the Board held an open Executive Meeting.  The key word is open.  It was a first for this Board.  Their agenda included the management company and the policy manual.  About 18 people attended and behaved as they should, well except for the twitter sisters.  President Walton did have to motion to them once.

As residents we had an opportunity to view our Board at work.  I think they did a good job.  More detail came out about the management company.  Additionally, it was very obvious that DeMarchi's committee had done a terrific job on their work to date on the Policy Manual.  Since we are thanking people, he did also, they were RV Wheeler, Randy Vaughan, Jude Davis, and Peggy Phillips.  Realize that this document was in pieces, some approved and some not.  They investigated, back tracked through records to verify and substantiate.  There are more steps to take but I believe we will be seeing the draft on the WPA website soon.

Good job Board!

Residents this was quick but I felt it was needed.  It is holiday time and I need to run but please read the next article and watch the blog for new articles.  There are a lot of items to cover.

THE BOARD IS BEING TESTED WITH "WHY CAN'T WE ALL DO WHAT WE WANT TO DO?"

I visited the WPA office today to review the correspondence file.  I had written the Board and received a proper response.  First, thank you to the Board and Kathy Phelan, for a reasonable response time.

As I reviewed the file I found two documents that speak to our topic.  The Board is responsible for governing our Association guided by our governing documents.  I believe a good Board is informed and delivers their messages according to the documents, with consistency.  Meaning, it doesn't matter who the resident is.  The answer to the questions is the same regardless of who asks it.

The role of the Board can become more complicated because of the nature of boards and the ever swinging board member exit, whether through election or resignation.  If one Board ignores a situation and doesn't deal with it, basically lets it stand, some will call it precedent even if it violates the governing documents.  Additionally, lawsuits, attorney shopping, majority board member agenda, etc. can complicate it further.  In fact it becomes a tug of war. 

In most of life, chaos breads discontent.  Give a few rebels a nod of approval by board members and we are off to the races.  We've had two previous years, more but 2009 and 2010, brought a decision to dredge canals and individually assess canal lot owners, sued by a group who then led a charge to recall board members, and the firing and hiring of several lawyers - lawyer shopping for the attorney who could present a case for the ruling majority board.

As residents, when we made our property purchase we agreed to follow the governing documents and pay our assessments.  We selected property in an HOA because we wanted stability in the areas that surround us.  Now, with the chaos many just want what they want.

Here is one residents view of the canal dredging and assessments.  I've removed their name and address.

----------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------

The 2009 Board assessed canal owners according to the By-Laws, under ARTICLE V, ASSESSMENTS AND PENALTIES, Section 2:  Individual Assessments:  In addition, individual assessments may be levied by the Board.  These relate to architectural review fees, lot maintenance, or any costs incurred, by The Association, in an effort to keep lots up to standards set in these By-Laws and in the deed "Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions."  After the 2010 Recall the 2010 Board had a Concerned Citizen majority.  Two of the new Board Members were suing the 2009 Board and all of its members individually.  The chaos grew.  They told people the assessment and the dredging itself were illegal.  They fired the 2009 Board Attorney of Record, and lawyer shopped for a new one - Moran. 

I've read his opinion and these people should be going to lien and foreclosure, according to our governing documents.  When he displeased them with another opinion, they fired him, and hired a new one.  Today, as I reviewed the correspondence file I read the opinion of Attorney Moody, written during the summer of 2011.  He basically says what Moran said.  I'm not copying it and presenting it here for you.  Sometimes people, you have to take the initiative and go to the office and read it for yourself.

Today, I also read Moody's current opinion  on liens and the assessment and he goes in the opposite direction.  I wonder why? You'll have to go to the office and read that for yourself.

Everyone should remember that the lawsuit spoken about in this letter was settled, signed off in behalf of all of us (including this writer) by Zieske, Wilson, and Thomas.  WAIT!  Could this writer be part of the Morabit team?  You know, let's sue the attorney and the law firm that gave the 2009 Board the opinion.

So now, we all want what we want and who is to stop us.  I'd like a curb like the illegal one across the street.  I'll have the white fence too!  I'd like to quit paying any assessment levied by any Board, because I don't want to.  If I have to live by whatever my neighbor constructs and pay when others just say no, then I'm not wanting to pay either.

THINK THIS IS FAR FETCHED?  READ ON:

The area called the Arbors has come up again and again.  It did again last month at the Board Meeting.  Seems their homes lack the square footage to meet our ARC requirements.  Yet, we already have paying members in homes with equal or less square footage.  First, Moody said no, they don't meet standard.  Then someone reminded the Board there are other homes that size.  Then the Board said we better send it back for review.  In the meantime, as I went through the file a group of 8 residents from the Arbors wrote the following, "We the undersigned homeowners of the Arbors do not want to become part of The Wedgefield Homeowner's Association."  Looks to me like they believe they should just say no, like the writer above and it is a done deal.  Looks like it works.  When do you and I get to say, I don't want it.  Their lots are in the PUD.  Their property documents tell them they have to join us.  The politics on the Arbors has been going on for years.

If these situations continue and you don't want to do what the Board says, say I'll sue, I'm not doing it, and get a whole lot of people to ride around in golf carts gathering signatures, calling the news paper, and revolting against the system, and TO HELL WITH THE GOVERNING DOCUMENTS AND BOARD AUTHORITY,  you can have a curb, a fence, and you don't have to pay a thing!

FINALLY:  IS THIS THE FAULT OF THIS BOARD?  No, it isn't.  These situations have a long history.  As my grandmother use to say, "this has been a long time coming".  It comes from divided sides on a Board (any board over a long period of time) rather than a Board that operates in the best interests of the community.  The problems have gathered energy, size and speed over the last several years.   It has become extremely political and it stymies our ability to move forward.   Our Board needs to help halt it.  Stop lawyer shopping and opinion shopping.  Stop the intimidation of the threat of lawsuits, and govern by the book in the best interests of the community.  Most of the Board are good conscientious people.   The swelling calamity of Wedgefield rests on their shoulders. They have to have the strength to turn the tide. 

 Do you have an opinion?  Email wedgefieldexaminer@yahoo.com.  Be sure an note whether you would like your name used.