Walton, then went on to say that the first project of the year, would be a card reader for the landing. Between, Walton and McMillin it was reported that there were two vehicles at the landing on a Saturday, neither having the appropriate stickers, and one possessing a landing card, not his, and he would not identify the resident, who had loaned it to him. McMillan, reported that he called the police, and that they came. Both intruders were told that they would be towed, if it happened again.
I attended the meeting, and waited for Walton to explain why the junk pictured below, was allowed at the landing.
This mess, was never brought up. Why, when we had such detail with the incident of the two men? Why was it there? Who put it there? Did the board have a project that they failed to tell us about? Was it just another cover up, your board allowing a favored resident to haul his junk to a common area of the association? Why would it be important anyway?
I believe that it was never brought up because your board only spends time reporting what they think will make them look like hero's who are hard at work in your behalf. I believe, just like the dock from the landing that was said to be unrepairable, then hauled into the canals, and not talked about, until another board member, insisted, that they aren't bringing it up, because they wouldn't look good. We now have a board, that doesn't have one member, who questions and brings things out in the open at the table. I don't believe that they have a WPA project, but I do believe that once again, they may have a favored resident, that has a project in process, and they are allowing them to use it as a temporary dumping ground. This particular committee, appears to love salvage, with ideas to use old stuff, save money, somewhere else, whether it be for the WPA, or themselves. Far out? I don't think so. We have many of the same players on the Water Amenities Committee, who were on board during that ridiculous dock saga. More confirmation needed? Take a ride by board member, McMillin's house. He has, what appears to be, some of the vary items in the picture, piled on his lot.
Why is it important? I'll be brief here, but it defies open, fair, governance, by this board. More will be covered on the subject as we make observations, about the January WPA Board Meeting. It appears to be same old, same old, except there isn't anyone at the board table, with enough integrity to question.
