There is no real vote for board seats. There are three seats available, and three current board members who will fill them again, uncontested. No one else was willing to step forward. That's the atmosphere these three have created, condoned, and furthered. There is no one left to challenge them, because these three, and the balance of your board, abused anyone who sat at that board table, and legitimately questioned any one of them, or their projects. Who would sign up for that abuse? These three all got a big NO by their names. My principles wouldn't allow me to vote any other way.
Candidates: Anderson, DeMarchi, John Walton - NO, NO, NO!
The By-Law change is presented below, in quotation. This has been presented for the third year. Our Legal Chair, did have a chuckle about that at a recent meeting. Personally, I thank the resident for their perseverance, and for standing by their principles! We need this, and once again for the third year, I vote YES, YES, YES!
"The Treasurer shall have custody of all property of the Association including funds, securites and evidence of indebtedness. He/she shall along with Board contract the services of a Certified Public Accountant to keep the books of the Association in accordance with good accounting practices and shall perform other duties incident to the Office of Treasurer as may be required by the Board."
The COVENANT change is presented below. As I stated before, you should all be very concerned about what your board is about to pull off here. It has taken quite sometime for our Legal Chair to get us to this point, but he and his support group (Concerned Citizens), backed by the blind eye our President (He appoints board chairs.), and the balance of this board - don't question each other, so we can get our pet projects approved, our vote on this issue doesn't count. You can vote, not vote, and it won't make a difference. Currently, it takes 100% of the membership to vote, in order to change the corner stone of our governing documents - the covenants. This is a safe guard intended to keep boards from going after the promises of our property deeds, etc. - the promise of Wedgefield, as a development, to the buyer. Our Legal Chair has stated that the WPA lawyer, reviewed, and approved this. Don't make me take the treacherous trip down this President, and Legal Chair's lawyer shopping. Go back and read the articles on the blog, listen to the tapes of the meetings, etc. Why would anyone trust this board to under take this, and work to break the promises intended with our property purchases? Do what you will, I voted NO, NO, NO, on principle, but it is too late to do anything about it, THE BOARD WINS WHETHER YOU VOTE, OR NOT. "IT IS UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED that the conditions, restrictions and limitations are made solely for the benefit of the grantor and grantee herein, and may be changed by a 60% vote of eligible voters (total of all members in good standing) at an annual meeting at which a quorum is present. Voting may be done in person, by proxy, or by mail-in ballot."
