*********************************************************************************
Do you have information, or an opinion - agree, or not, you can email The Wedgefield Examiner at wedgefieldexaminerthe@yahoo.com. We'll remove your name to protect the innocent, and publish it. P.S. If you would like your name published, please note that on your email, otherwise we leave your name out.
******************************************************
Readers, if you have been following the blog you'll know that this was a necessary step. I don't have a lot of time to go over all the detail again. Please go back and read:
"Thursday, April 12, 2018
A RESIDENT WRITES THE BOARD MULTIPLE TIMES, TO REVIEW THE SPOIL SITE RECORDS. THEY DON'T ANSWER FOR MONTHS, PRETEND THEY HAVE, AND THEN SECRETARY MC MILLIN WRITES AND TELLS HER THAT SHE IS IGNORANT ABOUT PROCEDURE, AND A FORM, THAT NEVER EXISTED UNTIL HE APPARENTLY MADE IT UP, AND DRAFTED IT HIMSELF!"
I was unable to attend the April WPA board meeting, but have talked to two residents who did attend the meeting. Your board did not report this resident's letters to the board under the community liaison report, or discuss the board secretary's sudden addition of a requirement necessary to review records - a requirement that did not exist under SC non profit law, or our governing documents. HERE IS MY LETTER TO THE BOARD:
April 22, 2018
TO: WPA
BOARD
FROM: Madeline
Y. Claveloux
RE: REQUEST
TO REVIEW THE CORRESPONDENCE FILE
FROM
SEPTEMBER 1, 2017 THROUGH MAY 1, 2018
CC: The
Wedgefield Examiner
As a member in good standing, I am requesting to
review the Correspondence File from September 1, 2017, through May 1, 2018. I
would like to come to the WPA Office on Tuesday, May 1st., at
11:00am to review the files. I am making
the request under the terms of SC Non Profit Law, and the approved procedures
noted in our governing documents.
Statement of Proper Purpose, as noted as a requirement
in the above noted documents: In general, I am very concerned about the method of
members securing a response from the board.
I have followed the three-month effort of a resident attempting to
secure approval to review the spoil site records, and was astounded to see a
response from our Board Secretary, adding additional unapproved requirements,
prior to access to the records. What was
even more alarming was that the Board Secretary chastised the resident stating
they were ignorant of policy – a policy that never existed, and therefore never
was brought to the board table, motioned, discussed, published on the website
for resident comment, or voted on at a second board meeting, and approved.
I look forward to your response, and approval of my
request.
