THE ABOVE PICTURE, CREATED BY MCMILLIN INDICATES HIS ACTIONS TOWARD RESIDENTS WHO QUESTION, AND EVERY MEMBER OF THIS BOARD'S LACK OF CONCERN FOR OUR GOVERNING DOCUMENTS. WHEN THE BOARD WANTED HIM TO TAKE IT DOWN, HE ALL BUT TOLD THEM TO KISS OFF, AND THEY ALLOWED IT, IGNORING OUR GOVERNING DOCUMENTS, AND THE INSULT TO ANYONE WHO DROVE BY IT.
Do you have information, or an opinion - agree, or not, you can email The Wedgefield Examiner at wedgefieldexaminerthe@yahoo.com. We'll remove your name to protect the innocent, and publish it. P.S. If you would like your name published, please note that on your email, otherwise we leave your name out.
****************************************************************************
HERE WAS THE RESIDENT QUESTION:
"So let's ask ourselves, is Adam Anderson an effective board member? Or is it possible the board is hoarding our assessment money that would go to projects like speed bumps and stop signs to pay for the canal dredging? Or a wee little of both? Lots to think about."
The resident who wrote the email was responding to an article I had written regarding Anderson, and his suggestion that the board add the speed bump question to the annual meeting ballot. After reading the resident's email, and thinking about the articles that have gone up in the last two days, and some that are in progress, I felt that the question should be asked about each individual current board member, but particularly board member McMillin who has sat on the board since 2008, is running for board again, and has been involved as a key player in so many questionable votes, motions, and suspect provision of information from the board table. I'll use McMillin's name as I pose the question to you. You insert anyone of the board member names on the line, and see what you think.
HERE'S MY QUESTION:
"So let's ask ourselves, is Larry McMillin an effective board member? Or is it possible the board is hoarding our assessment money that would go to projects like speed bumps and stop signs to pay for the canal dredging? Or a wee little of both? Lots to think about."
