Total Pageviews

Friday, September 29, 2017

RESIDENT WRITES THE BLOG REGARDING FURTHER ANNOYANCE

Thursday, September 28, 2017

RESIDENT MADELINE CLAVELOUX SENDS LETTER TO THE BOARD REGARDING UNANSWERED QUESTION REGARDING TREE CUTTING ON PRIVATE CANAL LOTS AT OUR EXPENSE, AND REQUEST FOR COPY OF THE WPA RESERVE STUDY, UNDER STATE LAW

EVEN THIS LITTLE GUY IS WONDERING WHY THE BOARD HASN'T ANSWERED MY QUESTION, IF WHAT THEY DID ABOUT THE TREE CUTTING ON PRIVATE CANAL LOTS, WAS LEGAL ACCORDING TO OUR GOVERNING DOCUMENTS, OR MORE OF THIS BOARD'S PRIVATE AGENDA!


***************************************************
Do you have information, or an opinion - agree, or not, you can email The Wedgefield Examiner at wedgefieldexaminerthe@yahoo.com.  We'll remove your name to protect the innocent, and publish it.  P.S.  If you would like your name published, please note that on your email, otherwise we leave your name out.

***************************************************************************
THE REASON FOR THE LETTER IS QUITE SELF EXPLANATORY.  THE LETTER, AND ATTACHMENT FOLLOW, AS SENT TO THE BOARD:
September 28, 2017

TO:                  WPA BOARD

FROM:            Madeline Y. Claveloux

RE:                  1) Request For Board Answer To Unanswered Question
                        Previously Submitted To The Board
                        2) Request For Copy of WPA Reserve Study, Under SC
                        State Law (Copy of Law Attached – Previously Sent To
                        Me By The Board)  Please see attachment to this letter.

CC:                  THE WEDGEFIELD EXAMINER

NOTE:  PLEASE DISTRIBUTE TO THE BOARD, PLACE A COPY IN THE CORRESPONDENCE FILE, AND RESPOND TO MY PRIVATE RESIDENT EMAIL ADDRESS mclaveloux@sc.rr.com.

 1) I wrote the board on August 26, 2017.  The subject of my letter “Two Questions Regarding Expenditure Of $7,950 For Removal Of Trees From Private Lots On The Canals”.  I received a response from Community Liaison Anderson that did not address one of my very specific questions.  Here is the question quoted from my letter: “If the board has not assessed the private canal lot owners, please reference the section, and specific language in the governing documents that allowed the board to use WPA funds, for the tree removal on private lots.”  Please go back to your own records for board member Anderson’s response.  Nowhere in his response, does he provide this 
critical answer.  He tells me that this was a unanimous vote by the board; therefore, he, or any member of the board should have been able to provide me with the information that I requested.  Please, answer this question now, as I’m sure the failure to do so was an oversight.  I can find no place in our governing documents that allowed you to vote yes, for that expenditure.  I researched the governing documents before I wrote, and again, after I received his response, and cannot find it.  In fact it appears that the board voted in violation of the governing documents.  I attended the September board meeting and heard a golf course lot owner with a tree that had fallen during Hurricane Matthew on a neighbor’s lot and blocked the speakers drainage ditch, and caused 7 feet of flooding during Tropical Storm Irma.  I listened to the board respond that the tree was the problem of the neighbor, and the board would notify the neighbor, and if they did not resolve the issue, the board would have it removed, and bill the neighbor.  I knew the exact section of the governing documents that allowed the board to speak to that resolution.  As asked in August, I’d like the board to quote “the section, and specific language in the    governing documents that allowed the board to use WPA funds, for the tree removal on private lots.” 


2)    I am requesting a copy of the WPA Reserve Study, under the SC State Law, as sent to me by the board.  Proper Purpose:  I attend almost all board meetings, and have before, and since The Reserve Study became a guidance tool to the board, particularly in the disbursement of our funds into reserves.  Several times over the years, I have heard the board saying that they are acting according to the Reserve Study.  I find such studies to be helpful to understand how, and why a board does things.  I view reading, understanding the contents, to being vital to my understanding of my community and where we are today, and in the future.    Please notify me as soon as convenient, when I can pick a copy up at the office.  I believe there should be no question of whether I receive it, or not, as I have met the requirements of State Law.

Thank you for your consideration and prompt answer.

HERE IS THE STATE LAW ATTACHMENT:
From: Alan DeMarchi [mailto:alanantd1@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2013 7:37 AM
To: Kathy Phelan; adam anderson; 'Bob Garrison'; 'Jacky & Judy Walton'; Janine Jill Cline; 'Jason Barrier'; 'John McBride'; John Walton; 'Larry McMillin'
Subject: Re: REQUEST TO REVIEW RECORDS & A Question
Please inform Ms. Claveloux of the following.  Since she wishes to follow all rules and regulations.  See highlighted items.  SC Title 33, Article 16 Code of Law.
SECTION 33‑16‑102. Inspection of records by shareholders. 
    (a) A shareholder of a corporation is entitled to inspect and copy, during regular business hours at the corporation's principal office, any of the records of the corporation described in Section 33‑16‑101(e) if he gives the corporation written notice of his demand at least five business days before the date on which he wishes to inspect and copy.  Shareholders holding at least one percent of any class of shares are entitled to conduct an inspection of the tax returns described in Section 33‑16‑101(e)(8) under the same conditions. 
    (b) A shareholder of a corporation is entitled to inspect and copy, during regular business hours at a reasonable location specified by the corporation, any of the following records of the corporation if the shareholder meets the requirements of subsection (c) and gives the corporation written notice of his demand at least five business days before the date on which he wishes to inspect and copy: 
       (1) excerpts from minutes of any meeting of the board of directors, records of any action of a committee of the board of directors while acting in place of the board of directors on behalf of the corporation, minutes of any meeting of the shareholders, and records of action taken by the shareholders or board of directors without a meeting, to the extent not subject to inspection under Section 33‑16‑102(a); 
       (2) accounting records of the corporation;  and 
       (3) the record of shareholders. 
    (c) A shareholder may inspect and copy the records described in subsection (b) only if: 
       (1) his demand is made in good faith and for a proper purpose; 
       (2) he describes with reasonable particularity his purpose and the records he desires to inspect;  and 
       (3) the records are directly connected with his purpose.
    (d) The right of inspection granted by this section may not be abolished or limited by a corporation's articles of incorporation or bylaws. 
    (e) This section does not affect: 
       (1) the right of a shareholder to inspect records under Section 33‑7‑200 or, if the shareholder is in litigation with the corporation, to the same extent as any other litigant; 
       (2) the power of a court, independently of Chapters 1 through 20 of this Title, to compel the production of corporate records for examination. 
HISTORY:  Derived from 1976 Code Section 33‑11‑250 [1962 Code Section 12‑16.25;  1962 (52) 1996;  1981 Act No. 146, Section 2;  Repealed, 1988 Act No. 444, Section 2], and Section 33‑11‑260 [1962 Code Section 12‑16.26;  1962 (52) 1996;  1981 Act No. 146, Section 2;  Repealed, 1988 Act No. 444, Section 2];  1988 Act No. 444, Section 2. 


Monday, September 25, 2017

THE WEDGEFIELD EXAMINER SAYS "WE'D BE REMISS IF WE DIDN'T TAKE TIME TO THANK TWO BOARD MEMBERS FOR THEIR ACTIONS AT THE BOARD TABLE DURING THE SEPTEMBER 2017 BOARD MEETING."


***************************************************
Do you have information, or an opinion - agree, or not, you can email The Wedgefield Examiner at wedgefieldexaminerthe@yahoo.com.  We'll remove your name to protect the innocent, and publish it.  P.S.  If you would like your name published, please note that on your email, otherwise we leave your name out.


***************************************************************************
Two board members surfaced for a moment in time, a long time, to represent in the moment, the residents of Wedgefield.

Board member Ebert should be thanked for voting 'NO", to board  member McMillin's ridiculous motion to waste our assessment funds by charging all of the membership $2,500 to redesign the parking lot outside our office, for the convenience of parking his big truck.  Thank you board member, Inge Ebert, for your "NO" vote.  It should be noted that she was the only board member brave enough to cast a "NO" vote.

The condo lot owners owe board member Ebert a second thank you.  Board member McMillin had motioned to approve payment of $1,700 to the contract landscaping crew to trim up trees "throughout the association".  Ebert asked if in covering the whole association, if he had trimmed the trees in the condo area roadways.  He responded, "the condo area????".  She named two roads that were the responsibility of the WPA in the condo area.  No, he responded, he hadn't. and now it was going to cost more!  She stuck with it, and he agreed to take care of it.  Every area in the association, on projects like this, should be considered, and not ignored.  Wedgefield residents, especially condo area residents, you were well represented by board member Inge Ebert.  A second thank you to board member Ebert.

The second board member who deserves a big thank you, and that is board member Anderson.  He reported again about speed bumps, and made a motion to the board that a opinion question regarding speed bumps should be sent out with the annual meeting ballot for an "opinion" count, not a vote.  Thank you board member Anderson, for asking for our opinion in a cost saving effective manner.  We do understand that that doesn't equate to a vote to approve, but you openly, and honestly sought our opinion, and that matters.  Thank you board member Anderson.

Sunday, September 24, 2017

TWO NEW ARTICLES WERE POSTED ON SUNDAY SEPTEMBER 24


RESIDENT WRITES THE BLOG REGARDING MINUTES, FINANCIAL REPORTS, AND RESIDENT TELEPHONE DIRECTORIES


***************************************************
Do you have information, or an opinion - agree, or not, you can email The Wedgefield Examiner at wedgefieldexaminerthe@yahoo.com.  We'll remove your name to protect the innocent, and publish it.  P.S.  If you would like your name published, please note that on your email, otherwise we leave your name out.


***************************************************************************
HERE IS THE UNEDITED RESIDENT LETTER (PLEASE NOTE:  MY COMMENTS FOLLOW):
Madeline,

Please feel free to publish my name with this message.   I am writing this in hopes of helping out residents who want to keep up with Wedgefield business.    I hope the information is helpful as this is my agenda. 

To the resident who wrote your blog about the absence of the meeting minutes from the HOA website.   I actually requested copies of minutes and the monthly budget statement from the HOA office 2 weeks ago.    

In regards to the minutes, Lee responded by telling me that they were posted on the HOA site under "Board."   I attempted to pull them up several times and got no results.   After letting Lee know the situation, she sent me the link to the minutes and there they were.   I have the link in my email system and will be happy to forward the message to anyone who wants access to the monthly meeting minutes.    They can email me at constancedowns559@msn.com and I'll be happy to help you out.    But the best answer to this problem is to attend the board meetings if you can.   Being present is much more informative than reading the minutes.  

As for the monthly budget statements, I am picking up my requested copies tomorrow.  I inquired about this Tuesday night before the board meeting.  I spoke to Lee about the fact that they are no longer posted on the website and she told me that due to privacy reasons they are no longer available on line.    I know that during some board meetings the statements are not always available because either the accountant didn't get them done in time or he was on vacation.   There needs to be a system of having this information available to residents in a timely manner.   You can request copies, but it's taking me two weeks to get them so there has to be an easier way of solving this problem.   Perhaps we can work with the board on this one?

You should also know that phone directories will not be available this year due to the cost.    Apparently the Printer couldn't get enough advertisers to pay for the cost of the directories so it would cost Wedgefield $1500.00 to get them printed.   The answer the board came up with was to eliminate them,but if you want a copy of the resident contact list you can go to the office and request one.  I recommend all new residents get this list.  

I hope this helps,

Connie Downs
******************************************************
COMMENTS:  First, these comments are The Wedgefield Examiner's thoughts.  I have not spoken to the writer prior to, or since her article submission, regarding this subject.  With that said, I thank her for her writing, and information.  

I give no thanks to our board for removing the financials, monthly meeting minutes, or the recordings of meetings, and to many other things to mention.  The privacy excuse does not work.  First, the board just removes these items, says NOTHING from the board table - no discussion, no vote, - NOTHING.  Additionally, our board took down our old website which was security pass worded, so only members could view these materials.  Your board should have hired a specialist to build the new site which would be secure, utilize pass words for members, and quit playing games about trying to protect information.  Your board already knew how to do that, and it is more of their half baked, mostly illegal - against our governing documents - moves. They  should have done the right thing for members.  That would have been a first! 


DON'T LET THE BOARD BELIEVE YOU ARE SHEEP!
I FIND NO HUMOR IN THEIR RIDICULOUS GOVERNANCE! 

WEDGEFIELD, "HOME OF THE BOARD", BECOMES AN EVEN MORE CLOSED SOCIETY - COMMUNITY, AS YOUR BOARD REMOVES ONE MORE PIECE OF OPEN COMMUNICATION. ANOTHER MOVE FROM THE BOARD TABLE DURING THE SEPTEMBER BOARD MEETING



DURING THE SEPTEMBER BOARD MEETING
YOUR BOARD TOOK AWAY PRINTING OF OUR
RESIDENT TELEPHONE DIRECTORIES.
WHAT THEY DID NEXT WAS THE EQUIVALENT OF
ADDING FUEL TO THEIR FIRE THAT BURNS OUR
"OUR GOVERNING DOCUMENTS"!
***************************************************
Do you have information, or an opinion - agree, or not, you can email The Wedgefield Examiner at wedgefieldexaminerthe@yahoo.com.  We'll remove your name to protect the innocent, and publish it.  P.S.  If you would like your name published, please note that on your email, otherwise we leave your name out.


***************************************************************************
Does the statement under the picture make you think that this is just drama from The Wedgefield Examiner?  Read the report provided below, put it in context with what has been growing under the leadership (????????) of this board for the last six to nine years, and decide for yourself whether it is my drama, or their, not so slow ride to corrupt governance.  Here is the report:

During previous board meetings secretary Cline has been asking residents to get their telephone number changes into the office, because they were preparing the draft for the printing of the resident directories.  Recently, she reported that they would be ready soon.  During the September 2017 board meeting, she reported that there was a glitch.  The printing of the telephone directories has always been at no cost to the association, because advertisers bought space in the Wedgefield Directory, that covered the cost.  The board didn't sell the advertising, it was handled by the entity that sees to the printing.  Prior to the meeting, Cline was notified that there weren't enough advertisers for the directory to cover the cost, and the books couldn't be provided at no cost to the association.  She had been quoted a price of $1,500 for 1,000 directories.  Wedgefield doesn't need 1000, in fact, about half of that, but 1,000 was the lowest number that printer would print.  What to do?  What to do?  Could they put a directory on the WPA website? No, it was the web, and privacy needed to be considered.  A resident sitting near me whispered, have they ever heard of white pages of a regular phone book?  Like, where that is distributed including the web?  Maybe, since they had the list all prepared, they could keep it in the office, and run copies if someone wanted it, one board member suggested. (Ever try and get a copy of any record from that office?)  They take no action of that, and move on, and Garrison asks the member audience of about 18 people, how many of them use the directory?  50-60% raise there hands.  In the end, there will just be no directories.  Cline suggests that people hold on to their 2016 directories.

Is the fact that we won't have a resident directory so important, or dramatic?  No, it is more in a chain of events of 6-9 years, with the board using our assessment dollars, on their own hidden agenda, while ignoring our governing documents.  What do I mean?  First quickly, at this very same meeting the board approves a motion by McMillin (VOTE HIM OFF THE BOARD) to spend $2,500 on his personal plan for the parking lot outside the office, for convenience of parking his, Johnson, and president Walton's big trucks. Garrison even asks who besides McMillin , who has been pushing this for 5 years needs this?  Yet, eight board members were present at the September board meeting, and all vote for approval of the expenditure, except Ebert.  There was no thought to residents needs, or Wedgefield's growth.  Hmmm "I'm saving you money, volunteering my labor, so I can spend money on what I want for me, McMillin", above sound thought, gets $2,500 for HIMSELF, and $1,500 - much less if anyone offered to research other printed options for 500 copies, get a big "NO", and a snaky move by Garrison later on.  Garrison goes back to the resident phone directory issue, and says that the governing documents require that the directory be printed, and he is having first reading to REMOVE this section of the manual.





 The match is struck to start the fire.  First up, the policy manual.




"Wedgefield Members Directory (Phonebook):   Communications committee will be responsible for updating, PRINTING, and distribution of the member's directory by end of June each year."


The burning of our governing documents is about to get a another log, 
GARRISON AT WORK AGAIN?
on this long established burn by this board.  The board has broken a by-law, that was added through a vote of the residents at the 2011 annual meeting.  Here it is:
"to adopt and add to Section 2 of Article IX of the by-laws the following sentence thereto:  A motion to change the policy manual must be presented at an open meeting, posted on the Wedgefield Plantation Association website for resident comments, and NOT voted on until the following Board Meeting."

Members, I needn't have checked but I went to the WPA website, and this change was not on the website.  I wasn't surprised, because since the submission to ballot in 2011 by residents, placement on the ballot, and vote to approve by the residents, this board has probably made 50 + changes to the policy manual, without following this by-law.  I've written, protested, and have received no answer, or change to their actions.  Note how the by-law reads.  There was no motion to remove at the September board meeting.  Either Garrison, or president Walton, stated at the time that we didn't need a motion for first reading.  They obviously, as so many times before, have chosen not to put it on the website, for comments.  I forget myself in even mentioning it, because this is small potatoes when they have removed so much from their official website - official recordings of meetings, minutes, financials, postings of agendas for meetings a week prior to the meetings, and didn't feel you would notice, question, or care.  


GET THESE BOARD MEMBERS OUT OF THEIR ILLEGAL
BOARD ROOM SEATS
YOU HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO FILL THREE SEATS THIS YEAR AND BEGIN TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE
VOTE NO FOR MCMILLIN
VOTE YES FOR:
BUTCH WILLIAMS
CONNIE DOWNS
BILL STEINER
VOTE NO FOR THE BOARD'S BYLAW CHANGE

WEDGEFIELD'S GOVERNANCE IS BEING BLOWN UP
BY THIS BOARD