Total Pageviews

Saturday, March 17, 2018

THE WEDGEFIELD EXAMINER, MADELINE Y. CLAVELOUX WRITES REGARDING THE $4000 CANAL LOT OWNER CONTRIBUTION FOR DREDGING. I HAVE CONCERNS, ACKNOWLEDGE A VISIT TO MY HOME BY A CANAL COMMITTEE MEMBER, AND MAKE A SUGGESTION TO ALL CANAL LOT OWNERS, BEFORE YOU WRITE YOUR CHECK. AM I GOING TO WRITE A CHECK? YOU'LL HAVE TO READ AND SEE!


*********************************************************************************
Do you have information, or an opinion - agree, or not, you can email The Wedgefield Examiner at wedgefieldexaminerthe@yahoo.com.  We'll remove your name to protect the innocent, and publish it.  P.S.  If you would like your name published, please note that on your email, otherwise we leave your name out.
******************************************************
I haven't posted in a while, despite the fact that the canal dredging, and so many issues here in Wedgefield have been on my mind.  I continue to deal with serious family medical issues here, and with state departments, attorneys in two states, on behalf of my youngest daughter. My article today may appear to be abrupt, and written in haste, but a visit to my home today by a canal committee member (not a board member), brought me to the key board.  An immediate decision and a call for action is needed to make a decision about whether my husband and I will contribute the $4000 to dredge.

The visit by the canal committee member "CC" (won't print name in full - my decision to protect the innocent), was informative, direct, and identified an emergency with the proposed dredging.  "CC" explained to me that although the current 10 year permit contains language that indicates that we could ask for an extension on the permit, that in reality the committee has been informed that we can't.   Why?  In layman's language - think I got this right, Wedgefield was issued a 10 year permit, when usually a permit is good for 5 years.  5 year permits do have an extension process.  10 year permits do not, despite the fact that our 10 year permit contains language in issuance that speaks to extension.  We are all now placed in the position, that if we are forced to rush to dredge now, we must pay the $4000 each.  If not, we will lose the benefit of the $162,000 canal lot owners voluntarily paid for almost 10 years ago.

I didn't beleaguer "CC" with questions about when the board and committee knew this.  Quite frankly, as a member of the canal committee, I don't know how "CC" drew the short straw to come to the home of Madeline Y. Claveloux, and present this information.  He, along with all of you are aware  that I refused to pay the $400 required to move forward with the current dredge proposal, in open protest of the ILLEGAL - AGAINST OUR GOVERNING DOCUMENTS FOR YEARS, BY THIS BOARD IN THE LEAD UP TO THE RESERVE ACCOUNT FOR DREDGING, LACK OF VOTES FROM THE BOARD TABLE TO MOVE FORWARD ON THE DREDGING, FOR THE LAST TWO YEARS.  THE BOARD'S MACHINATIONS OF OUR GOVERNANCE IS SICKENING, AND UNFAIR TO ANY MEMBER WHEREVER YOU LIVE IN THIS ASSOCIATION.   I can't hold him responsible.  He didn't live here during the years leading up to the last dredging, and all the lawsuit entanglements, etc.  I do hold long existing board and canal committee members responsible for this miserable mess.  I blame Anderson, John Walton, president Walton,  McMillin, Garrison, and former board members DeMarchi, and Cline, for not only this mess, but the general distruction of Wedgefield's governance.

I can't make this long, so we have to go to the moment of the current decision.  Should you as a canal lot owner pay the $4000 to let this dredging go forward, and deal with the illegalities of this board later?  My immediate thought was yes!  Surprised?  Don't be!  That permit cost canal lot owners $162,000.  Most of us gave gave every time we were asked.  Some of us paid a bigger human cost than most, and were caught in lawsuits for about 3 1/2 to 4 years, and paid additional monies to counter sue.  I hold the people who fought and paid up front along side me then and stood tall in the moment, who now walk around going "it was wrong, we'll do it better this time, in every aspect of the new dredge".  Those people are MC MILLIN, ANDERSON, AND JOHN WALTON.  GARRISON HAS LEAD THE CHARGE TO THIS POINT, AND THESE PEOPLE HAVE FOLLOWED HIM, DESPITE THE FACT THAT THEY SUED HIM, IN THE LAST DREDGING, AND TURNED THIS PLACE UPSIDE DOWN WHILE DOING IT, AND HARMED GOOD PEOPLE'S WEDGEFIELD PUBLIC IMAGE AND BROKE UP STRONG FRIENDSHIPS WITH THEIR DISTORTIONS OF THE TRUTH OF GOVERNANCE.

I attended the canal meeting hosted at the WPA office about a week ago.  In general the meeting was disheartening.  While the attendance count would be between 40 and 50 people, only about 20 - 25 canal lots were represented, as most of the people there were couples.  We were told that 50 of the 79 canal lots paid the $400.  Your charming canal committee provided a map of the canals and lots, and published the lots with the names of people who failed to pay the $400.  No problem to me, I'll stand front and center when I make a decision.  Righteous people within the audience called the 29 non payers FREELOADERS!  There was only two board members at the speakers table that evening - Anderson and John Walton.  Where were the rest of the board?  Those who have had plenty to say about the dredging along this miserable way - Garrison, Jacky Walton, McMillin, Keith Johnson, were hiding in the office.  They didn't come out and speak, or take questions.  They were accompanied by Phillips - surprise, surprise.   One resident, who was here for the long ugly history of the permit, last dredging - and actively, and valiantly worked during that period, had a question from the floor.  It centered around the permit - the process to seek the extension, the delays by this board in coming to a vote in previous - recent board meetings.  The resident was getting no answers, never really did.  The resident finally said the equivalent of - listen the most important thing right now is getting the extension on the permit.  Time is of the essence, and finally the resident said that there were 5 canal lot owners sitting on the board.  They had 5 votes to push forward a motion to seek to secure the extension, would they use their votes?  The resident never got an answer.  Those at the speakers table looked at the floor.  It is moments like this, that I ask you, how can you support these guys, and anything they have said to you in the last 2 years (minimum).

As to whether I'm going to write the check for $4000 to save the permit, and therefore the dredging, I will decide after Tuesday's board meeting.  I suggest to each and everyone of the lot owners who haven't paid the $4000, that you attend the meeting, and make your decision, if two things happen at that meeting.  As of today, according to what I gathered from "CC", only 15 canal lot owners have paid the $4000.  That leaves 64 canal lot owners who  have a decision to make.  I suggest that at least one, or two of you do the following, and get answers from the board table, at Tuesday's meeting.

1)  One of you, write the board today, and ask Water Amenities Chair, John Walton to include in his report from the board table, the date that the board and committee knew that they couldn't seek an extension on the permit?

2)  One of you write the board, and ask John Walton,  McMillin, or Anderson, to bring a motion, discussion, and a vote to be recorded in the minutes, as to whether the board is going to continue to contribute funds at 15% after 2019 for future dredging.  Will the the unused funds from this dredging if completed, be held in the canal dredging reserve?  This is important, and should be to everyone, particularly you new canal lot owners who may not realize that if this current dredging is allowed, that you are one storm away - and we've had them back to back, two years in a row, silting in the canals, and this dredge has been advertised, as the last dredge, because the spoil site won't be able to be used again.  That doesn't mean that we may have to pay a bigger price next time, and we won't have to work with having the dredge materials hauled out of here.

NOTICE TO ALL OTHER NON CANAL LOT OWNERS, PARTICULARLY THOSE ON THE GOLF COURSE.  There was fun at your expense at that last canal owners meeting.  The righteous in the group wondered where you were.  They said you should be contributing voluntarily, and assisting, because some on the canals helped pay for the mowing expense.  After all they said, that when we had flooding from the storms, and most drainage from the association and the golf course came into our canals, we saved many of you from flooding with our canals.

Get to the next board meeting - this coming Tuesday.  Let's see whether anyone was brave enough to ask this board to answer these questions?  I won't write my check, until I have those answers, and you shouldn't either.  Board, and canal committee, answer these questions, and I'll run to write the check and save the permit.

PS:  Thank you "CC" for your integrity, and for being brave enough to knock on the door of my home, and discuss this.


Wednesday, March 7, 2018

RESIDENT WRITES THE BLOG ABOUT ANOTHER SECRETARY LEAVING THE WPA


*********************************************************************************
Do you have information, or an opinion - agree, or not, you can email The Wedgefield Examiner at wedgefieldexaminerthe@yahoo.com.  We'll remove your name to protect the innocent, and publish it.  P.S.  If you would like your name published, please note that on your email, otherwise we leave your name out.
******************************************************
Before you read the resident letter, keep in mind a few other things.  I believe there were 4, or 5 secretaries in the three years.  Worst thought - they have all been working with entries into our financial reports.  In the least, inconsistency. PS:  150 people have already checked the blog this morning.  These readers are probably looking for a report on last night's CANAL LOT OWNERS MEETING.  I am right smack in the middle of filing legal reports in CT.  I have plenty to say about the meeting, and will get the report up in the next 24 to 48 hours.

HERE IS THE RESIDENT'S UNEDITED LETTER:
Board President, Jacky Walton, has called an open board meeting for Friday March 9th at 7 pm.
The purpose of this meeting is to discuss the hiring of a replacement for the office clerk.
This will be brief and only item on the agenda.
This is the posting on the HOA website.... Let's think about this.... 3 secretaries in 3 years (or less), Kathy, Linda, and Lee.   Why is it so hard for the HOA to keep an office clerk?   It's the perfect job for someone wanting to work good hours and a part time job in a nice residential setting with views of live oaks... AND with Fridays off.  The pay is in line with most part time jobs and the commute is not bad for anyone who lives in the area.     

Some things the board may want discuss during their Friday meeting:

Just from observations.   Despite what Peggy Phillips and Larry McMillan say about their position on the board being a volunteer job, they sure put in a lot of hours and days at that office..... which makes me wonder... "micromanagement?"     

Do the residents of Wedgefield really need to pay another clerk when Peggy and Larry are holding down the fort?    

Or perhaps we should hire an office "manager" not another clerk?     Someone with absolutely no connections to the board or residents who can look at things objectively and not feel as if their position is lower than "volunteer" staff?   Perhaps someone canvassed by a staffing agency?

COMMENT:  This board can't keep a secretary.  Remember, this person also does financial entry, and our accounting mess continues down the same path as it has for years.  December 2017 the board treasurer was going to look into hiring an accountant.  January  & February 2018 - whoops no real report on that.  Take a little look at history.

A PARAGRAPH FROM  BLOG ARTICLE 2015FROM JULY 24, 2015
Here is where some of the answers, inadvertently, start coming.  Treasurer, Demarchi, reports that the bookkeeper has left, and he is trying to find another. DeMarchi says the former bookkeeper (?????) left because she was upset that she couldn't use a 5 year old program, and the WPA had gotten a new one. He lists some of the things that the new person would need to do.  He has a quote in a envelope for $600/mo., but wants to table it because the CPA (believe that we use for the audit) is in Europe, and he'd like to wait for a schedule of his fees.  Garrison jumps in and asks him what he is waiting for?  He states that this guy bid once, then renigged on the bid.  Garrison said that we have been without the bookkeeper (position to be filled?????), for "MONTHS AND MONTHS".  At another point Garrison says, "I don't want to wait.  It has been long enough, fooling around with this."  Still later, Garrison speaks about integrity, protection to board and Kathy, in having these services performed.  Cline says we need to do the right thing.  Later, Garrison suggests that DeMarchi call the board to a meeting BEFORE the next meeting, to get this done.

Friday, March 2, 2018

RESIDENT MADELINE Y. CLAVELOUX, RECEIVES AN ANSWER FROM THE BOARD REGARDING THE BOARD'S CLOSED MEETING ON MARCH 1, AND THE CANAL LOT OWNERS MEETING ON MARCH 7TH.


*********************************************************************************
Do you have information, or an opinion - agree, or not, you can email The Wedgefield Examiner at wedgefieldexaminerthe@yahoo.com.  We'll remove your name to protect the innocent, and publish it.  P.S.  If you would like your name published, please note that on your email, otherwise we leave your name out.
******************************************************
Readers/members, I received the following answers from community liaison, Anderson on March 1, regarding my letter to the board about two meetings,  called by the board.  Thankfully, board member Anderson, has included my letter in his answer.  First, I thank him for answering my letter respectfully, and for sharing it with the board, as should be.  HERE IS HIS RESPONSE.  NOTE:  COMMENTS FOLLOW IN RED AFTER.

March 1st 2018

Mrs. Claveloux,
I am in receipt of your letter and questions about the two upcoming meetings. I will copy and paste your question and answer them in bold print below each question.

1) Notice to all board members of the Closed Meeting to be held on March 1st.  Proper Purpose of request:  Our by-laws call for written notice, at least 3 days of the meeting, called by the president, or secretary.  I would like to review for myself, whether the meeting was properly called, and the reason for the meeting.  While notice of the meeting is posted outside of the building, as residents, we have no indication of who called it, or why it was called.  Such information use to be posted on the website.  I reviewed information on the WPA website today, and it has not been made available to the membership.

This meeting was called by President Walton on Monday March 26th in an email to all 9 board members. It is a closed meeting and the agenda is personnel issues. There is an email generated by the office, dated on the 26th, that I am sure you can review at the office if you so desire.

2) Notice to board members of the "canal lot owners", meeting scheduled for March 7th.  Proper purpose of request:  I attended the February WPA meeting, and heard from the board table that all members would be invited to attend this meeting, that was to be scheduled prior to the March WPA meeting.  I have contacted another resident who attended the February board meeting, and they recalled hearing the same thing.  I want to see by reviewing the notice to board members of this meeting, how it was written, and who might have changed it as the meeting was being called.

This meeting is a water amenities committee meeting that is open to any WPA member  that would like to attend. The purpose of this meeting is to bring the canal lot owners up to date on the dredging project, to discuss the challenges the committee has been dealing with and to let the canal lot owners know what will be needed from them to move the project forward.

I look forward to your notice as to when I can come in and review these notices.  I appreciate your time, and consideration.

You may come in and review the closed meeting (March 1st)  email notice at your convienence during regular office hours. The canal committee meeting is not subject to notice but was posted on the website.

Have a great day!

Adam Anderson
Community Liaison

COMMENTS:
There are very few instances when the board can hold a closed meeting. Anderson states that it was for personnel issues. We have one paid staff person, and two contractors who perform bookkeeping. The board has used the term "personnel", at other times, and it wasn't always personnel.


"PERSONNEL AS DIFINED BY THE WEBSTER DICTIONARY:

Definition of personnel

1a : a body of persons usually employed (as in a factory or organization) 
b personnel plural  : persons"

So when we attend the March board meeting, we'll see what was covered in the closed meeting.  In the past the information as to who called the board meeting, reason for the meeting, and date, and time, were published on the WPA website, that was before the board went through the period where they removed the tapes of meetings, minutes, and financials.  One would think with the board that claims openness, and a new website effort, that the information would have been posted.

In regard to the canal lot owners meeting, here is how it was posted on the website:

NOTICE FROM THE WPA WEBSITE REGARDING THE MEETING ON MARCH 7, 2018:
"NOTICE TO ALL CANAL LOT OWNERS:
MEETING TO DISCUSS DREDGING
MARCH 6TH AT 7 PM - AT THE OFFICE."

The last meeting for canal lot owners was closed.  Those non canal lot owner residents who asked if they could attend were told "no".  At the time, I wrote the board and asked them to open the meeting to everyone, and was told "no".  The posting on the WPA website, does not appear to include everyone.  In fact, other residents questioned it.    Was it posted that way intentionally?  Could be.  Did you all get a special invitation attached to your front door like I did as a canal lot owner?  Please let me know. 

HERE IS THE INVITATION THAT WAS DELIVERED TO CANAL LOT OWNERS?






Wednesday, February 28, 2018

I HAVEN'T RECEIVED AN ANSWER FROM THE BOARD ABOUT THE CLOSED MEETING ON MARCH FIRST, OR THE CANAL LOT OWNERS MEETING. WHY? JUST STALLING UNTIL THEY HOLD THE MEETING ON MARCH 1ST?



*********************************************************************************
Do you have information, or an opinion - agree, or not, you can email The Wedgefield Examiner at wedgefieldexaminerthe@yahoo.com.  We'll remove your name to protect the innocent, and publish it.  P.S.  If you would like your name published, please note that on your email, otherwise we leave your name out.
******************************************************
HERE IS MY LETTER TO THE BOARD: NOTE COMMENTS FOLLOW IN RED AFTER THE LETTER:
PLEASE DISTRIBUTE TO THE ENTIRE BOARD, AND PLACE A COPY IN THE 
CORRESPONDENCE FILE

Board, 
I am requesting notice from you as to when I can review the following records:

!) Notice to all board members of the Closed Meeting to be held on March 1st.  
Proper Purpose of request:  
Our by-laws call for written notice, at least 3 days of the meeting, called by the 
president, or secretary.  
I would like to review for myself, whether the meeting was properly called, and 
the reason for the meeting.  
While notice of the meeting is posted outside of the building, as residents, we have 
no indication of who 
called it, or why it was called.  Such information use to be posted on the website.  
I reviewed information 
on the WPA website today, and it has not been made available to the membership.

2) Notice to board members of the "canal lot owners", meeting scheduled for 
March 7th.  Proper purpose 
of request:  I attended the February WPA meeting, and heard from the board table 
that all members would 
be invited to attend this meeting, that was to be scheduled prior to the March WPA
 meeting.  I have 
contacted another resident who attended the February board meeting, and they 
recalled hearing the same 
thing.  I want to see by reviewing the notice to board members of this meeting, 
how it was written, and 
who might have changed it as the meeting was being called.

I look forward to your notice as to when I can come in and review these notices.  
I appreciate your time, 
and consideration.



Madeline Y. Claveloux
**********COMMENTS**********
I've done everything properly with this email to the board, why won't they answer?  The meeting on March 1st should have been properly noticed to the board, and the notice should be a record that members have a right to review.  This type of lack of response to legitimate questions, based on actions they should have taken according to the governing documents, is just one more nail in their huge casket, in failing to follow the governing documents.  Members, wherever you live in Wedgefield on the canals, golf course, or condo, they have already promised a meeting from the board table on the suspicious handling of the spoil site. That meeting was announced to be open, and to be held between the January and February meetings. It didn't happen, and the spoil site wasn't even mentioned in the water amenities report during the Feb. meeting. They went silent on their mess.  During the Feb. meeting the water amenities committee announced they needed to extend the permit, had to hurry and apply by the deadline, when they lead you to believe one and half years ago, that their plan to dredge, was timely, and they had everything synchronized.  I wrote Anderson then (yr and 1/2 ago), and suggested that they had time to slow things down and do them right, and should extend the permit.  You should have questions, and write the board, because they haven't been leveling with any of us for a long time.

MAYBE THE BOARD JUST HASN'T TOLD THE CARRIER PIGEON THAT THE ANSWER CAN BE DELIVERED.

Tuesday, February 27, 2018

RESIDENT WRITES THE BLOG, AND TITLES THEIR EMAIL - "WHERE'S WALDO - BOARD MEMBER JOHNSON"



*********************************************************************************
Do you have information, or an opinion - agree, or not, you can email The Wedgefield Examiner at wedgefieldexaminerthe@yahoo.com.  We'll remove your name to protect the innocent, and publish it.  P.S.  If you would like your name published, please note that on your email, otherwise we leave your name out.
******************************************************
HERE IS THE RESIDENT'S UNEDITED EMAIL:

Where's Waldo?   Or should we be saying "Where's Keith?"    

Mr. Johnson was absent from 2 board meetings in December and left the January meeting early after giving a brief report on how many permits were approved and how many refunds were submitted.  Residents were enlightened.  After searching high and low, there was no Keith to be found at the February board meeting.    For any of us who've had the experience of sitting around and waiting for good ole Keith to show up and approve a project or refund a deposit, we ask, why is this man holding a seat when he's obviously not engaged in his responsibilities?    To top it off, Mr. Johnson is the defendant behind the lawsuit filed by a resident.   And if you read the complaint filed by this individual, it's not a glowing recommendation to  Mr. Johnson's communication skills or work style.   So why is the chronically absent Keith keeping his seat on the board and continuing to provide input on the water amenities committee?   Perhaps to push the dredging project through?   Let's face it, the board consists of 5 canal lot owners to 4 non-canal lot owners.    They wouldn't want to upset the apple cart if he stepped aside.  

Keith's absences may be legitimate; who knows?  But for the good of the community, no matter what the reason, if he can't bring himself to show up and sit through an entire board meeting, he should step aside and allow someone else to take his seat.