Please review yesterdays articles (March 10th), regarding the records review, denial of my rights for copies, and consider for yourself, why the board had to develop a instant discriminating change in copy policy that violates state law. After review of the files, it could appear your board needs to hide how they handled this whole mess. I waited for files that I was told were waiting for my review for over a week. They had to call for the Request For Proposal and the contract, to board members homes! I encourage each of you to review these records. Initially, while I waited, I was told that the contract was probably at President Walton's for signature. Then, ops, it wasn't. The document ?????? I was handed was President Walton's bid. Now, I was told his bid was the contract??????? There weren't any places for SIGNATURE BY EITHER THE CONTRACTOR OR THE WPA, NO START DATE, TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT, OR TERMS OF PAYMENT.
President Walton, how will you explain this to any inquiring authorities? Perhaps, you could call in Compliance Chair, De Marchi. I forget myself. De Marchi issued the Request for Proposal ?????, accepted the bids (We don't know how, because the RFP did not indicate anything, let alone how they'd be received.), and recommended your bid, to your board, who couldn't have done due diligence and reviewed the documents, because they were probably in De Marchi's home, where they appeared to be yesterday. Yesterday's review, has done nothing but reveal, the miserable situation you created in this situation, and many more during your administration.
I did bring a member, as a witness, to what occurred.
