Total Pageviews

Friday, March 14, 2014

THE WPA BOARD MEETING IS MARCH 18TH. THE BOARD OPENS THE MEETING TO RESIDENTS' COMMENTS. WILL YOU HAVE QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS FOR THIS BOARD? YOU MIGHT CONSIDER SOME OF THESE

Based on all the things that have happened since the last meeting, if you have been following them, you might consider these questions.

1)  President Walton, why won't you answer the question as to how you could have bid and accepted a contract with the WPA to fix the gate house, after signing the Conflict of Interest, required by every board member?

2) Compliance Chair DeMarchi,  how could you have even entertained sending a bid to the President of the association, after you signed a Conflict of Interest, required by every board member, doesn't that breach the responsibility of your role as Compliance Chair?

3)  Secretary Cline, how could you have sat back and laughed during board member McBride's questioning of Conflict of Interest, during the October Board Meeting, and voted to award a contract to the President of the association, after you, yourself, signed the Conflict of Interest?

4) Board members:  McMillin, Walton (John), Anderson, Johnson, how could you have voted to award the President of the association a contract, after you had signed the Conflict of Interest?

5)  Vice President/Legal Chair Garrison, how could you have failed to seek a Legal Opinion, feigned lack of understanding of board member McBride's questions of conflict of interest, after you had signed the Conflict of Interest?

6)  Community Liaison Anderson, how could you put your name to correspondence that denied the right of a resident, any resident, AND Board Members themselves,  copies?  Who on the board contributed to that correspondence and what governing documents, laws, etc., did you or they site?  Have you as a board member been voting without proper review of documents?

7) Board Member DeMarchi, can you explain why calls had to be made to your home, to secure records that a resident had been informed by the board, were all ready for review, and yet you had them, at home?  The lack of professionalism and integrity in the records that were provided, could indicate more problems for this Conflict of Interest issue, why weren't the records in the office? Could you explain why the bidding process appears so poor for the gate house fix?

8) Board Member McMillin, can you explain who put board member DeMarchi in charge of the gate house project, when the vote took place under Grounds?  Why weren't you in charge?

9) Board Member McMillin, why are you investigating reworking the parking and drive in front of the office, when on review of the correspondence file, not one resident, has complained about it? Is this for the convenience of the board?  If so, perhaps you could park in the back lot.

10)  President Walton, when did the board meet and discuss policy for copies to residents?  If they haven't met, how did you allow that letter to go out to the resident?  Was this just retaliation by you and the board because too many questions were being asked about conflict of interest, or were you afraid of what they would see in the records of DeMarchi's bidding process?

11) Board member DeMarchi, why is the storm debris contract signed two weeks after you stated the contractor started?

12) Board member DeMarchi, why did the debris clean up start at your front door, rather than on the major roads that we ALL have to travel on?  I'm aware that the contractor staged in your area, but quite frankly, the contractor had to cover these miles at one time or another to get the job done.  Is this apparent, selfish, direct benefit to you, who directed this project, another conflict of interest?

13) Board member DeMarchi, is it true that after S&W left that there was still debris left in the condo area?  If so, who had to pay Great Lawns?  Will S&W "eat that expense"?

14) Legal Chair Garrison, Since our previous attorney of record's license has been suspended, it could cause doubt regarding the critical opinions he gave regarding a number of important issues, and you have failed to get most opinions in writing, how will anyone be able to examine those opinions, and verify their validity?

There are probably many more questions.  Will you get to the meeting and get to the bottom of some of these issues?