IF YOU ATTENDED THE SEPTEMBER 19 WPA MEETING YOU KNOW THIS APPLIES TO THE BOARD!
What is the promise? THE WEDGEFIELD EXAMINER PROMISES TO PRINT THE ARTICLE ABOUT THE RESIDENT, THE DRAINAGE DITCH, AND THE TREE BY 10:00AM TOMORROW, SEPTEMBER 22!
What about those blog stats? TODAY WAS ANOTHER BUSY DAY. THE STATS ARE PROVIDED BELOW FROM THE BLOG BACK STATISTICS PAGE:
Pageviews last month
|
3,288
|
Pageviews all time history
|
83,183
|
Take note of those stats board and residents. What were a large number of residents reading? Here is another piece of information from the back page stats - the # 1 article viewed today:
A BIG QUESTION GOES UNA
Sep 13, 2017
What was the full title of the article, and what was it about?
HERE IS THE FULL TITLE OF THE ARTICLE:
"A BIG QUESTION GOES UNANSWERED BY BOARD MEMBER ANDERSON AND YOUR BOARD. A REVIEW OF OUR CURRENT SITUATION - REMOVAL OF RECORDINGS, THEN MINUTES THOUGH SANITIZED AND NOT DOCUMENTED PROPERLY, AND FINANCIAL REPORTS, JUST ADD TO THE PICTURE OF A BOARD RUN AMUCK! WILL SOME OF YOU SEEK LAWSUIT TO BRING THE TRUTH TO THE SURFACE?"
HERE IS THE UNANSWERED QUESTION NOTED IN THE ARTICLE:
"If the board has not assessed the private canal lot owners, please reference the section, and specific language in the governing documents that allowed the board to use WPA funds, for the tree removal on private lots." Anderson, writing in behalf of the board, stated that the vote regarding the use of association funds to pay for the removal of trees on private canal lots was a unanimous vote of the board. Every board member should have known, if they voted as individuals, after full discussion of the motion, exactly what language in the governing documents allowed them to do that. Therefore, every, or any board member should have been able to defend their vote, and answer the question. Why not just answer it?"
PLEASE NOTE: 100 RESIDENTS WERE READING THIS ARTICLE TODAY. BOARD HOW WILL YOU AVOID ANSWERING ME AFTER I PUBLISH THE TREE AND DITCH ARTICLE TOMORROW?
|
100
|
