WHERE'S THE BEEF????????
Remember the burger commercial of several years ago when the little old lady would yell, "where's the beef"? Well I'm willing to be the little old lady of Wedgefield, and ask Pietkewicz, Thomas, Walters, Wilson, and Zieske, "where is the court order from the October 3rd. hearing?" Just like the little old lady wanting to verify for herself there was real meat, I want the real meat of their platform, rather than the claims they are making, as to what the court decided. I want them to present it, so I can read it and verify their claims for myself! If they can't produce it, it isn't so.
They claim, "The State of South Carolina was declared the owner of the canals in Wedgefield Plantation. As a result, the WPA has NO authority or obligation to dredge or maintain the canals, the Board must now deal with a number of issues as a result of that Declaratory Judgement.
*The "Special Assessment" was illegal as well as the $175 added to our yearly assessment.
*The Board has placed liens on canal property owners who have not paid the $5,000.
*There is a matter of the bank loan with First Federal. This transaction may be illegal also. This issue will have t be addressed right away."
Demand the truth. They are counting on you to fall into place, and take their word for it. They want you to buy their "filler filled beef", without reading the label. Ask them to provide you a copy of the signed order. They won't be able to provide it. It doesn't exist, as of November 6th.
This whole document lacks truth and integrity. They make accusations about the dredging permit, proper authorization and signature on the bank loan, and $7,500. They are making charges like a bull without horns. Go back to the tapes and minutes of the Board Meetings. The dredging permit was recently discussed. Go to the minutes of the August 2009 Board Meeting, regarding the canal and dredging and funding public votes, and read and listen to fact.
Just for a moment, a glorious, happy, moment, as I read this document, I assumed there was another candidate running for Board - Jude Davis. Why? About 40% of the publication was spent attacking Jude Davis. Why, while promoting your candidates for election, would you find it helpful to attack a resident, who wasn't running for Board? They pulled that hat, out of their own dark closet!
They ask if Davis has sued you yet? The document talks about what they view as the Board's next legal challenge, if they are in charge. They speak about misrepresentation in the signing of the loan, and dredging permit. Not true! They fail to tell you the gross misrepresentation of three of their candidates: Zieske, Wilson, and Thomas, when they sued the 2009 Board, in behalf of "Wedgefield Plantation". THEY WEREN'T ON THE BOARD AT THE TIME. NO ONE VOTED FOR THEM TO REPRESENT US AND TO SUE, IN BEHALF OF WEDGEFIELD PLANTATION. That's a court document you can review!
DO YOU KNOW WHAT YOU ARE LEFT WITH IF THIS BURGER HAS NO BEEF? If you elect Zieske, Wilson, Thomas, Walters, Pietkewicz, you are left with a Board without substance, quality, and truth. MAKE THEM PROVIDE YOU WITH A COPY OF THE WRITTEN OCTOBER 3RD. COURT ORDER BEFORE YOU VOTE. DON'T TRUST THEM TO DO ANY THING IN BEHALF OF WEDGEFIELD.
This whole document lacks truth and integrity. They make accusations about the dredging permit, proper authorization and signature on the bank loan, and $7,500. They are making charges like a bull without horns. Go back to the tapes and minutes of the Board Meetings. The dredging permit was recently discussed. Go to the minutes of the August 2009 Board Meeting, regarding the canal and dredging and funding public votes, and read and listen to fact.
Just for a moment, a glorious, happy, moment, as I read this document, I assumed there was another candidate running for Board - Jude Davis. Why? About 40% of the publication was spent attacking Jude Davis. Why, while promoting your candidates for election, would you find it helpful to attack a resident, who wasn't running for Board? They pulled that hat, out of their own dark closet!
They ask if Davis has sued you yet? The document talks about what they view as the Board's next legal challenge, if they are in charge. They speak about misrepresentation in the signing of the loan, and dredging permit. Not true! They fail to tell you the gross misrepresentation of three of their candidates: Zieske, Wilson, and Thomas, when they sued the 2009 Board, in behalf of "Wedgefield Plantation". THEY WEREN'T ON THE BOARD AT THE TIME. NO ONE VOTED FOR THEM TO REPRESENT US AND TO SUE, IN BEHALF OF WEDGEFIELD PLANTATION. That's a court document you can review!
DO YOU KNOW WHAT YOU ARE LEFT WITH IF THIS BURGER HAS NO BEEF? If you elect Zieske, Wilson, Thomas, Walters, Pietkewicz, you are left with a Board without substance, quality, and truth. MAKE THEM PROVIDE YOU WITH A COPY OF THE WRITTEN OCTOBER 3RD. COURT ORDER BEFORE YOU VOTE. DON'T TRUST THEM TO DO ANY THING IN BEHALF OF WEDGEFIELD.