We have sitting board members who have no problem jabbing at those who frequently ask questions and calling them trouble makers. I'm viewed as one of them. Some of them have a problem with residents who ask informed questions and refuse to take them at their word. I do attend meetings, listen to the tapes, review documents, etc. I am an informed resident. For those who are skeptical about my feelings, I'd ask them to go to the meeting recordings for 2009 and 2010. Go to the correspondence file and review the same years. The residents with constant questions, comments, and those who critized the board then, are the ones they now call "friends" and "so helpful".
This was the canal sub committee's survey. Did Anderson supervise the process? Did he verify that it had been sent? Doesn't look that way.
Again, I like Kathy, but I question her sending her explanation to the dreaded, no one reads it, Wedgefield Examiner. I question her reprimanding a resident in this manner. I question why those on the board did not have the good judgement to first oversee the project, or answer a resident with the facts themselves. That would have been professionalism.
Do I believe it happened the way it is stated in the letter? I'm not sure, but either way our staff secretary is the scape goat because your board didn't have the professionalism or the guts to handle it.
HERE IS HER LETTER: