Total Pageviews

Thursday, May 16, 2013

IS THE WPA BOARD & WATER AMENITIES COMMITTEE ANSWER TO THE "OLD # 1 LANDING DOCK SITUATION" TO SELL IT? IS IT REALLY FOR SALE? IF IT IS, IT SHOULDN'T FLY AND THE QUESTIONS REMAIN THE SAME

You'll have to read the postings of the last few days to follow this article.  If you have been reading you'll understand the headline.  Today, I received a call and was told that the old number one landing dock, unrepairable,  needed to be replaced?????, would be hauled out of here so as not to land in our "backyard", survived towing, was placed behind a private residence in the canals, is NOW for sale.  I took a drive but it is difficult to see from the road.  We'll go on the basis that IF some of the board and the Water Amenities Committee feel that this POSSIBLE move takes away the questions, they are wrong!  Why?  Too much water over the proverbial bridge and screams cover "our tracks", which travel up and down like a Billy goat and the trail is more than GRUFF!

The questions follow, some repeated, some new.

*Why would we as residents allow this board to hood wink us, while ignoring organization structure  FULL BOARD, EVERY COMMITTEE MEMBER informed? 
*Why expect the situation to go away, after the actions that have occurred, differ DIRECTLY from what was stated at the board meetings?
*Why expect that threats to individual board/committee members, by other committee/board members, along with a "hate campaign", be viewed as acceptable by decent residents?
*Who on the board and Water Amenities Committee knew the dock was going to be towed into the canals?
*Who towed the dock? 
*Why would you be trying to SELL something that couldn't be repaired, unless you didn't need the dock replaced in the first place?
*If it is for sale, who authorized it?
*If those who knew, and those who towed it, committee or board are so confident that they are doing what they voted on during an open meeting, why haven't they answered my resident questions, and gone to a poor PLAN "B"?