DRAINAGE
The Wedgefield Examiner has transcribed the April Drainage Report. The transcription will be added later today. More than a few questions surface after listening to it. If you haven't listened to that portion of the tape, you should.
*Why do some have to pay and others not?
*Does buyer beware surface when you buy property?
*If a board member's property is directly involved along with property he sold, and contracted to build on for the new owner, is conflict of interest involved, if the board member makes a motion to spend association funds, for services that other residents have had to pay for, and then votes to approve his own motion?
*Why if McMillin called on a clause in the grounds contract to avoid securing bids, wasn't that same clause used in selecting a vendor for this related drainage contract? Why was a known good performing vendor shoved aside for a $20 difference in a bid, for an unknown performer?
*Does this contract violate consistency, ethics, and possibly surface the question of conflict of interest?
*Why did President Walton shut down the discussion on the motion, saying the equivalent of "discussion had gone too far a field", when the questions went unanswered, and they were legitimate?
Read the transcription later today.
REQUEST TO PRESIDENT WALTON
As a resident, I'm left to just publicly asking the question, because your president and his board don't have the ethics, or are unwilling to discuss their actions openly and, respond to residents.
Mr. President, will you please bring and read the Code of Ethics you had every member of the board sign, and explain how the fiasco that has happened with the Water Amenities Committee and many of your board members, comes any where near living up to it, during the May WPA board meeting? Will you please bring the complete by-laws and explain how your board has made all the constant changes to the policy manual, while violating the newest by-law, approved by a vote of the residents in 2011?
