Morabit titles his presentation "Appeal For Unification". He states, "We need to unify...we're all good people! Enough! please reconcile our differences. We're all good people and need to respect each other." Did he really mean we are all good people? What about the 2009 Board? The now famous Dredging Board, are they good people? They must be because he said we are all good people.
Whoops he didn't mean what he said., "some residents, adverse to the majority of residents and non-canal property owners, manevered to control the Board only to violate its own Code of Ethics...Assessments were Rammed down our throats!" You must not be good people if you did that. The 2009 Board maneuvered to control the Board? That is a lie. One last time, on the day of the 2008 annual meeting the Concerned Citizens had six seats on the nine member Board, after the election.
On the day of the 2008 Annual Meeting Davis, Gettmann, and Mc Millin were elected to serve with six Concerned Citizens. They hadn't left the meeting when Peitkowicz and Foxwell resigned. Later that day Buno resigned. The Board totaled six now, three Concerned Citizens - Zieske, Aberle, and Phillips and two canal lot owners - Davis and McMilllin, and non canal lot owner, Gettmann. They posted the three vacant positions. They filled them with Huggins, Arendt, and Claveloux. Two of the three were non canal owners. It is important to remember before they filled the vacancies that non canal lot owners were were 4-2. I, Claveloux, was the third canal lot owner added and I was told that I was the unanamous choice of the group which means that even Zieske voted for me.
Within a few weeks Zieske, Aberle, and Phillips all resigned within hours of each other. Where was the maneuvering? It is all a lie. Their vacancies were posted and filled by Reames, Martin, and Marlowe. Not one of them was a canal lot owner! Again, where was the maneuvering?
Who is maneuvering now? Morabit. He wants the Board to sue the bank and the Bell Legal Firm, with our association money. You'll see just how covert they are when you read the document - McBride's December Legal Report.
Finally, Morabit says, "answer the legal issues regarding'Common' interests, and 'General Benefit of the Subdivision'; canal dredging assessments are not legal....placing liens associated with illegal assessments are not proper" This takes us to another document. Morabit's Concerned Citizen warriors - Zieske, Thomas, and Wilson sued in behalf of Morabit, and each and everyone of us, whether we knew it, or liked it. They settled! See how they settled it and review The Release Signed by Zieske, Wilson, and Thomas. What is Morabit's problem? Why isn't he accusing them of manuevering? As you view their signatures each sign "individually and on behalf of Wedgefield Plantattion Association". Why doesn't he ask them why they signed off on behalf of him? Looks like he doesn't like their representation because he's back at it. I believe they prompted him to speak.
As you review McBride's December Legal Report you'll see that your Board has remained silent, with full knowledge that meetings with Attorney Moody with Huggins, Wilson, Thomas, and Perrow were billed to the association for services rendered on October 11 and 12. From McBride's report, "Mention was made that the State and First Federal just might have some responsibility and therefore might be potential law suits. In fact Mr. Moody did say he put First Federal on notice." Huggins, Wilson, and Thomas as Board Members, met with the attorney, prior to any Board approval. Later in the document, As it turns out more than $5,000 of work was done and paid for and none was ever approved by the Board." Why isn't the Board acting on this? Why isn't the Board reporting any of this? Is it all covered in their closed executive meetings?Additionally, you'll note that during the meeting McMillin questions loose leaf binders on the table. Moody tells them Fred Thomas provided them to him. It is noted that at a glance there might be some of the legal documents that were removed from the office during Thomas' reign as legal chair. How can that be? Thomas keeps accusing Jude Davis. Remember the lock changes after the recall? She didn't even have access. This is just more of the dog chasing his tail. They never get to the bottom of it.
Spend time with the report. In the end McBride states, "It's incumbent that this matter be discussed with the people involved, (past and current Board members), and that this situation be ameliorated." Thank you John McBride. Why won't this Board allow you to bring these items to the Board table? I would like to be able to trust the Board. It appears they hide these topics to sing let there be peace. I want peace, but not at the expense of an underground war. We'll lose, buried by the Board's failure to clear the table of this filth. We have some very capable Board Members. It is time for them to step up to the plate and level with us.
Do you have a comment? Send it to: wedgefieldexaminer@yahoo.com Note whether you want your name included.
