HOW LONG WILL YOU TRUST THE CONFIDENTIALITY MISUSE AND NOT CALL IT WHAT IT IS - PLAIN OLD SECRECY?

This morning I resigned from the Canal Committee, a sub committee of the Water Amenities Committee.  No one individual is so important that a workplace, or your local government, etc., can't live without them.  So for those of you who think I don't know that, I do.  Therefore, no big loss.

What you should be concerned about is the abuse your Board is placing on this association.  They have enforced signing the Confidentiality Agreement, intended to protect private resident financial information, in order to silence all committee members, so they can tell you, what they want to tell you.  SECRECY is what you should be concerned about.  Several of your Board have already violated the true intent of the agreement in Board Meetings and in the Wragg. To date, they haven't enforced it, or even informed us how they will enforce it, on their own.  Would the heavy hand fall on a committee member publicly?  Would the member be thrown off the committee?

In this case, they want secrecy about a possible solution to the canals.  Skip all the reflection back to the ugliest time in our history.  What was it all about?  Those dreaded canals!  What were most of the ugly claims about? SECRECY, regardless if it was true, or not.  How do they start research on this option?  They do it with SECRECY!

HERE IS MY RESIGNATION LETTER, MINUS A PARAGRAGH THAT MIGHT HAVE EXPOSED THE BOARD'S SECRET OPTION: