HERE'S A FEW HIGHLIGHTS:
*A board member's wife takes the resident speaker spot. We will cover what was said, but begin to ask yourself whether truth and back up documentation is negative? While the problems with this board are serious, tonight the performance could just appear as the association version of the song, "Stand By Your Man".
*The old dock will go soon but the integrity of this board should be questioned when the Water Amenities' Chair would not tell the membership what it sold for? Could that be negative? Depends whether you understand what they were trying to pull. We will write about it as positively as possible. When the board supports this behavior by turning a blind eye, that could be difficult. The Water Amenities Chair also put everyone on notice that they had fired the board /committee member that asked the question. Wait, is it negative to remind you that this is the same committee chair who physically threatened the very same board/committee member?
*The board allowed the Grounds Chair to continue to use our assessment dollars to underwrite the mowing of private lots. Pouting works! That's what the Grounds Chair did last month. I think they broke another by-law by supporting this.
*The board quickly by passed the 2011 bylaw, tried to make the board member who questioned it look bad, and then passed all those policy manual changes. Some of their behavior was very negative. Maybe the board member's wife will have to come back next month. They didn't learn a thing.
Complete information will follow over the next few weeks!
