We are going to start at the beginning of a twisted piece. Find a comfortable chair and please take the time to read the entire article. You'll recall that Mr. Morabit wrote The Wedgefield Examiner and asked that his opinion be published. If you haven't read it see "Resident Morabit Writes the Wedgefield Examiner" at this blog. As he writes the Examiner he compliments, "Thanks for your notification and invitation service to deliver opinions both pro and con to the people of the Wedgefield community!" Later, "Here’s your chance to continue your support for the dissemination of the truth, and opinions that may be contrary to your own. This policy enables residents to evaluate issues for themselves. I will look for its quick publication. Thanks for your continuing blog service to Wedgefield!" On September 25th he writes the following to DeMarchi, "It has come to my attention after reading the latest distasteful "Wedgefield Examiner", Remember the dates: Morabit writes the Examiner on the September 27 and DeMarchi on the 25th.
On September 24 Wijthoff has written the Board on the issue of Morabit's lots and shared his letter with the Examiner. Wijthoff never uses Morabit's name.
On September 25th Morabit writes DeMarchi. His email is presented below. I have removed their email addresses. There is nothing on this email that indicates that the email was distributed to the entire Board. Here it is:
On September 27th DeMarchi writes Morabit. His email is presented below. I have removed their email addresses. Again, there is nothing that indicates that DeMarchi shared this with the entire Board. Here it is:
First note who DeMarchi has been discussing this issue with - Zieske. Note the work that DeMarchi has done at the assessor's office on behalf of Morabit. Once again, you've seen the timeline. DeMarchi leaps to help a man who threatens lawsuits in his letter to the Examiner and who threatened lawsuits in Feb. and March of 2012 against each board member who failed to vote yes in behalf of another lawsuit. Is this what it takes for residents to get action from the Board. Would you and I get this individual attention? DeMarchi references the board meeting on the 26th, "I again defended your ownership and voting rights to the board and the audience." Isn't this the same board member who was calling Wijthoff about his voting rights within hours of Concerned Citizen, Thomas writing the Board? He's spending a lot of his time talking to one side - Zieske, Morabit, and Thomas. Why? Additionally, Wijthoff spoke at the board meeting on the 26th. He never once mentioned Morabit's name. Al DeMarchi did! Where is the integrity of his confidentiality agreement? He wants all volunteers, board, and staff to sign it. He, and his fellow board members have been the only ones to break it! Could we have consistentcy and fairness on any level?
On October 1st Morabit writes DeMarchi his thanks. Morabit does ask that his email be distributed to the entire board. Here it is:
I've visited the office and secured the documents noted above from the Correspondence File. Usually, I remove the writer's name. Since Morabit had his name published on the blog, I've included it. I am concerned that some residents get this kind of service, when others don't even get answers to correspondence.
