Total Pageviews

Friday, August 17, 2012

RESIDENT JUDE DAVIS RESPONDS TO SUB ASSOCIATION


Madeline,
I read your article about the Anderson/Garrison solution to the canal dredging problem and I am highly insulted. Do these two geniuses actually believe that the 2009 Board did not consider a sub -association as a solution!!
In reviewing old documents, I found several cases where this idea was discussed. At least one attempt at a sub-association was initiated by the water front property owners. In the early ‘80’s, individuals owned 20 waterfront lots and the developer owned the rest. When these waterfront owners approached the developer controlled Board about a sub-association, the answer from the legal standpoint was that it couldn’t be done.
This idea was again floated by the attorneys in the early and then late ‘90’s. The attorneys’ opinion continued to be no because of legal issues.
I approached Tom Winslow about the same idea of a sub-association. In his opinion, adding a sub-association would mean a change to the covenants, not the by-laws. Additionally, the WPA could not force this idea on any existing property owner as ‘they’ hadn’t bought their property with these conditions.
For the life of me, I can’t understand Garrison’s resistance to individual assessments. I know that Carol Zieske has said that individual assessments can only be used for small projects. She must have a crystal ball because the by-law doesn’t indicate any amount. I guess individual assessments were only allowed when she was on the board! To date, no one has challenged this assessment in court!
I find it interesting that Adam is proposing that the board contribute about $40-$50 per household as their share. At $50 per household, the amount comes to $28,850. This amount is supposed to ‘cover’ the 45% of unsecured waterfront the WPA owns as well as the debris added daily by the drainage system. If we do some backwards math, $28,850 is 45% of $64,111 leaving $35,261 for the canal lot residents to contribute or about an additional $452 per property. Where did Adam get his figures? What is the cost of the next dredge? At $64,111 annually when can we do a maintenance dredge? How much will be dredged?
I believe that any intelligent property owner would want answers to these questions before making any decision. Once again, I ask—WHAT IS WRONG WITH INDIVIDUAL ASSESSMENTS OTHER THAN THE CC LEADER DOESN’T LIKE THEM?
Jude

Anyone is welcome to write to The Wedgefield Examiner via email: wedgefieldexaminer@yahoo.com. Remember to note whether you would like your name published with your article. The option is open to anyone who writes.